Posts Tagged ‘immunology’
Immunology, last encore?…

One way – maybe not a good way – of learning about the immunological system is being alerted to something – a term or an acronym, and going down its rabbit hole to find its connection to things you know a little about. So, neutralising antibodies and Omicron – I’ve taken this phrase from an early episode of The Immunology Podcast (ep 24 – though that wasn’t the main topic of the episode, linked below), Omicron being a late and seemingly less deadly variant of SARS-CoV-2, – what to make of it?
A neutralizing antibody (NAb) is an antibody that is responsible for defending cells from pathogens, which are organisms that cause disease. They are produced naturally by the body as part of its immune response, and their production is triggered by both infections and vaccinations against infections.
Which makes me wonder – aren’t all antibodies neutralising antibodies? Well, there are also binding antibodies, which bind to a pathogen and alert the immune system to its presence so that it can then be destroyed by white blood cells. Neutralising antibodies are a product of B-cells in the bone marrow. They work ‘by affecting how the molecules on the pathogen’s surface can enter cells in the body’. For example, with viruses there are two types, enveloped (they’re inside a lipid membrane) and non-enveloped. The enveloped types are heat-sensitive, the non-enveloped are heat resistant, which sort of makes sense. In the case of the enveloped type, the neutralising antibody blocks its attachment to and entry to the cell, and with the non-enveloped type, the antibody can bind to the capsid protein, which is the protein shell that surrounds the genetic information within a virus cell.
So where do we go from here? Well let’s look at this capsid protein and how the antibody binds to it, presumably to prevent the virus from replicating – what they mean by neutralising? But take this:
Neutralizing antibodies can also stop pathogens from changing their structure and shape, known as conformational changes, in order to enter and replicate within a cell.
So pathogens can change structure and shape once they’re in the body, in order to enter into particular cells within that body? Anyway, there are viruses that can get their way around NAbs by means of regular mutation. Such viruses include Zika and dengue, not to mention influenza. And it can get worse:
A process known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), which leads to more severe infections, can take place when a virus binds to antibodies that help the virus infect cells. The virus is better able to enter into cells in the body and is sometimes more able to replicate once it has entered a host cell.
So it seems these antibodies are a double-edged sword, as these summarising remarks indicate:
Neutralizing antibodies have found application in medicine and are often used as part of vaccines, but they have been found to help viruses enter cells and replicate to cause severe infections, and as such ensuring that neutralizing antibodies will not facilitate infection is an important part of developing vaccines.
So that’s enough of NAbs for now….oh but what about that connection with Omicron? Omicron was/is a highly mutated variant of SARS-CoV-2 which has ‘evolved into many different sub-variants’ according to the abstract of the paper linked below, which lists at least some of these sub-variants, and it’s a long list. It seems these sub-variants may have survived/thrived by being a whole lot less lethal than the original strains. But don’t take my word for it. Anyway the paper was published back in March 2023, and the pandemic was very much on the wane by then I think, so it does seem as if the virus has found an accommodation with our bodies, or antibodies, or whatever.
So enough already, I think it’s time to switch to another topic, I’m way out of my depth with this one. And yet, it’s so…. I’ll keep listening to the podcast, at least.
References
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9985919/
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.abn8057
Ep. 24: “Autoimmune Disease” Featuring Dr. Jennifer Gommerman
immunology – an ongoing fascination

Immunology is one of those strange subjects – those who know virtually nothing about it tend to pontificate about it (I’ve experienced this), while those well-versed in it feel overwhelmed by the complexity of the human immune system and how much they still have to learn, and how each new uncovering opens up more layers of complexity.
I’ve just started to listen to The immunology podcast, some of which sounds to me as if it’s spoken in Yiddish, but it’s not the fault of the presenters – the podcast is clearly aimed at established immunologists and advanced students, with lots of in-house terminology and an assumption of knowledge not yet, and mostly never, possessed by myself. Today I was listening to episode 103 – the most recent – but it was only marginally less comprehensible than episode one (no, I haven’t listened to all the podcasts in between!). It didn’t help that I was walking through Adelaide’s pleasant parklands while listening – lots of lovely avian antics to distract me.
Anyway, let me look at more terms and concepts. Cytokines are small proteins, and there are many types, some of which are slightly familiar to me – interferons, interleukins, lymphokines, chemokines and tumour necrosis factors. Tumour necrosis means the death of tumour cells – which sounds good but often isn’t. Necrosis shouldn’t be confused with apoptosis, which is programmed cell death. More about that later, perhaps. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) is produced mostly by ‘active’ macrophages. So what’s an active macrophage? AI tells me (I’ve been warned against using AI as a definitive source, but as a starting point it’s generally reliable) that there are two types – classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2). You can see how all these bifurcations complexify the complexities, but let’s stick for now with M1, which are more clearly involved in immunity. AI again provides some basic detail:
They exhibit enhanced phagocytic capabilities, meaning they are better at engulfing and destroying microbes, and they release pro-inflammatory cytokines to recruit other immune cells to the site of infection.
So phagocytes are engulfers and destroyers of pathogens, and macrophages are BIG ones, apparently. So, clearly, anything with the -kine suffix is a small protein involved in the immune system, but not all such proteins use that suffix. Let’s look at interleukins (he said, sounding like a teacher). They’re mostly produced by white blood cells, aka leukocytes, and they act as messengers or signallers between cells involved in the immune system. It’s now known that they’re produced by many types of cells. They’re identified by numbers – IL-1, IL-6, IL-10 etc. Something I worked out today in the parklands!
But just on language, a subject I’m a little more comfortable with, the term cytokine seems to be an amalgam. Kine is a biblical term, though perhaps from later translations, referring to cattle. Perhaps the emphasis, above all, is on plurality. Cyto- is used in the term cytoplasm, and probably refers to something ‘inside’ (AI calls it anything intracellular, and it also explains ‘kine’ in terms of movement – kinesis, kinetic energy, from the Greek).
I very much remember the ‘cytokine storm’ described during the COVID-19 days, which seemed to suggest that people were being compromised, sometimes fatally, by the immune system’s reaction to the pathogen. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) refers to this, but it can also be a response to immunotherapy. The fever that it may induce can raise a number of unforeseen problems. According to one PubMed article,
A cytokine storm is a hyperinflammatory state secondary to the excessive production of cytokines by a deregulated immune system. It manifests clinically as an influenza-like syndrome, which can be complicated by multi-organ failure and coagulopathy, leading, in the most severe cases, even to death.
It’s this kind of reaction that anti-vaxxers use to accuse immunologists of criminality. No doubt they’d interpret ‘deregulated immune system’ as a ‘deregulated immunology system’. But the science can point to huge successes, first with smallpox, and then with so many other potential killers – cholera, tuberculosis, polio, tetanus, diphtheria, whooping cough and influenza, to name a few.
So the same PubMed article, which focuses on COVID-19, lists a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines found in patients with the infection, such as IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IP-10, GM-CSF, MCP-1, and IL-10 – IL meaning interleukin, TNF-α meaning tumour necrosis factor-alpha, IFN-γ being interferon-gamma, a type II interferon, IP-10 (interferon gamma-induced protein 10) being a chemokine or small protein involved in many immunological processes, signalling in particular, GM-CSF standing for granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (of course), and MCP-1 (monocyte-chemoattractant protein), aka CCL2 (C-C motif ligand 2), which is a chemokine that attracts monocytes and other immune cells to sites of inflammation. A monocyte is another type of leukocyte or white blood cell – let’s see, types of leukocyte include granulocytes, monocytes and lymphocytes.
We’re just beginning, which makes me wonder, what’s more complex, our neurological system or our immune system? Probably a meaningless question.
Anyway, let’s get back to interleukins. Our genome produces more than 50 of them, and they’re vital to the effective functioning of our immune system. Deficiencies, which are rare, are known to be a factor in auto-immune diseases. Wikipedia provides detailed info on only 15 of them, so presumably there’s still more work to be done on their various functions. Some of the detailed structures and functions that are presumably known to immunologists are more or less incomprehensible to me, e.g 12-stranded beta sheet structures. To give an example, of knowledge and manipulation that’s beyond my ken:
Molecular cloning of the Interleukin 1 Beta converting enzyme is generated by the proteolytic cleavage of an inactive precursor molecule. A complementary DNA encoding protease that carries out this cleavage has been cloned. Recombinant expression enables cells to process precursor Interleukin 1 Beta to the mature form of the enzyme.
Right. There’s a mnemonic for some of the ‘important’ interleukins which might be useful, but I won’t give it here (I don’t find it useful). IL-1 is associated with fever and heat, Il-2 is a signalling molecule in T cells, affecting their growth, differentiation and function, and is important in anti-tumour cancer responses, and Il-3 is another signalling molecule, produced by T and other immune cells, influencing macrophages, mast cells (white blood cells which produce histamine and protect against various pathogens and toxins), and the odd megakaryocyte.
Megakaryocytes are, rather obviously, large. They’re present in bone marrow, where they produce platelets – colourless cell fragments important for blood clotting. Platelets circulate in the bloodstream and aggregate at injury sites. They’re also known as thrombocytes. Much of this blog piece will be like a glossary. For example, stem cells. Think of a stem that subdivides into many different parts. They can also simply divide into more of themselves. But a megakaryocyte isn’t a stem cell. Megakaryocytes are more specialised, and are derived from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). They arrive at being megakaryocytes ‘through a hierarchical series of progenitor cells’. I’m relying on AI for much of this. So, a HSC is a multipotent stem cell which can differentiate into all the blood cell types. So maybe I’m going beyond immunology here into the whole of biochemistry, but it’s virtually impossible to draw strict boundaries.
Anyway, I shall stop here, or pause, having loaded myself with enough preliminary information. It’s marvellous stuff, and I’ll be going on about it for quite a while….
References
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interleukin
the immune system 1: introducing the adaptive immune system – MIT lecture

Just something to start with…
It was in 1796 that Edward Jenner created the first vaccine, using material from a cowpox sore on a milkmaid’s hand and injecting it under the skin of an eight-year-old boy. I’ve not been able to ascertain whether Jenner injected the material directly into the boy’s bloodstream. In any case this has been regarded as the world’s first vaccination, a term coined by Jenner (from vacca, Latin for cow). Variolation, using smallpox scabs inhaled by the patient, had been practised in Asia for centuries before Jenner, and was promoted in Britain by Mary Wortley Monagu earlier in the 18th century. Variolation was certainly effective, and for some time there was a dispute about the best treatment. In any case, what was being brought into action by both treatments was the adaptive immune system.
So now to MIT’s introduction to immunology course, presented by Adam Martin. He mentions, in his first lecture, that there are many levels of immunity, and goes on to describe two, innate and adaptive immunity. Innate immunity is ‘the first line of defence’, and acts immediately. Neutrophils, which are white blood cells, are part of this innate system, which is quite static and unchanging, involving a constant surveillance. Adaptive immunity is also known as acquired immunity – and its acquisition takes time.
The adaptive immune system is more specific than the innate. That’s why we need regular flu vaccinations, because flu viruses can evolve quite rapidly. These vaccinations are designed to combat or provide immunity to new strains of the virus.
There are two branches of adaptive immunity: humoral immunity, which is protein-mediated (the proteins are called antibodies). This type of immunity is called humoral because these antibodies are secreted into bodily fluids or humors (blood, mostly). The types of cells that produce these proteins, these antibodies (Ab), are called B cells, which are matured in the bone marrow. The other branch is cell-mediated immunity, which involves T cells, which are matured in the thymus gland, near the top of the lungs.
So far so simple, but next we’re shown a scarily complex chart showing the derivation of all these cells from hematopoietic stem cells – most of these cells comprising the innate system, but also the T and B lymphocytes of the adaptive system (and they’re called lymphocytes because they’re the primary cells found in the lymph). So, it’s important that we can trace the ‘tree’ back to its ‘roots’, the progenitor cells.
Both the humoral and cell-mediated immune system cells have antigen receptors, which recognise specific antigens (Ag). An antigen is any substance that creates/generates an immune response.
Antibodies – goodies; antigens – baddies.
So, the B cell antigen receptor is also called an antibody, and an immunoglobulin (Ig). Structurally, antibodies are proteins with a lipid bilayer, which represents the plasma membrane. Outside of this membrane is the exoplasm, and inside is the cytoplasm. (I’m a little confused here – this sounds like the description of a cell, not a protein). Anyway we’re describing a B cell, and the antibody (protein) can have a trans-membrane domain spanning the plasma membrane, and an exterior Ig domain. These domains are modular folds (polypeptide chains) that are separate from the rest of the protein, and are inserted into the cell membrane, with an N-terminus exterior to the cell and a C terminus within the cell. Each antibody protein has two long polypeptides, the identical ‘heavy chains’ of the molecule. They also have smaller ‘light chains’, and it’s all laterally symmetric. The external tips of these antibodies are what recognises and binds to the antigen.
Now to the T cell receptor (TCR). It’s very different, and simpler, structurally. It has two chains, alpha and beta, and fewer immunoglobulin repeats. The tip of this double chain interacts with the antigen.
The B cell’s receptor, or antibody, has different forms. Some antibodies have transmembrane domains and are anchored in the plasma membrane, but other forms lack the transmembrane domain and instead of being an integral membrane protein, they’re secreted into the blood. The membrane-bound form comes first, but as an infection progresses, the secreted form becomes dominant. The T cell receptor only has the membrane-bound form.
There are many different antibodies, and each given antibody will recognise a different antigenic structure. They can recognise small molecules, proteins, DNA, carbohydrates, lipids, etc. But apparently that’s the B cell’s antibodies. The T cell receptor is more restricted, recognising peptides – short sequences of amino acids – which are presented by the MHC complex (classes 1 and 2). More of that later.
Properties of the immune system. First, specificity – they can finely discriminate between molecules. This is of course essential to avoid the prospect of auto-immune diseases. So, how are such levels of specificity achieved? Well, it’s complex.
Looking at B cell antibodies again, with their heavy and light chains. There are different domains on the heavy chain that are either variable or (more or less) constant. And the same goes for the light chain, with the same lateral symmetry described above. So, looking at the amino acid sequence of the variable part of the antibody (protein) molecule, looking at its structure from N to C terminus …. (?)
By convention, peptide sequences are written N-terminus to C-terminus, left to right (in LTR writing systems) – [from Wikipedia, N-terminus]
Imagine taking these antibodies from the variable region of the chain and aligning them (their amino acid sequence) from N to C. Each is a different antibody (or heavy chain polypeptide) produced by a unique B cell. Then we consider the residue number…
The amino acid residue number refers to the spot in the linear chain where that particular amino acid is found. For example, the number 20 means that amino acid is 20th in the chain.
.. and how much each amino acid residue varies along the sequence. ‘So if we were to align antibody gene stretches like this’, and check out the variation, we could graph it as in the diagram:

The Y axis being the amount of variation, and the X axis is the residue number along the polypeptide sequence. So you see from this graphic that there are three regions of hyper-variability. These regions are also called complementarity-determining regions (CDRs). Apparently there are always three of them?
So what are these regions? We’re shown a crystal structure of one of them (both heavy chain and light chain), with an antigen attached, as well as a ribbon diagram with its CDR, which contacts the antigen. We’re next shown an Ig fold with three loops extending from it, which can bind to external particles. These IG loops vary in amino acid sequence and each tiny variation will affect the binding ability, or affinity to an antigen. So the key here is the CDR.
Each B cell expresses a unique antibody protein, with unique specificity, due to its unique sequence at the CDR region. To get more of a particular antibody, the cell that expresses it can be clonally expanded, creating monoclonal antibodies. Each of those B cells will have an antibody, or antigen receptor, with that same specificity.
So that’s the generation of specificity, but the generation of diversity is also vital for enhancing the immune system. How is this diversity achieved? There are millions of B cells that have unique antibodies, and there aren’t a million genes producing those cells – we have about 30,000 genes. The answer is somatic ‘reshuffling’ or recombination. We have a single heavy chain gene, and two light chain genes, for antibodies. They’re made up of multiple gene segments. Specifically, the parts that make up the variable domain are composed of gene segments that are shuffled during the development of the B cell to give rise to a diversity of proteins.
So we’re next shown a graphic headed, no doubt importantly, ‘the immunoglobulin gene contains multiple V, D and J segments – one of each needs to be brought together to form a functional antibody gene’. The graphic, which I won’t reproduce here, shows the human Ig heavy chain locus on the right. On the left is a variable (V) gene segment, containing 45 variable genes. There’s a diversity (D) segment next to it, containing 23 more of these genes, and then there are 6 joining (J) segments. All of these are distinct regions of the gene, the exon that encodes this variable region of the antibody.
So there are multiple V, D and J segments.To generate a functional antibody, one V has to be brought together with one D, which then has to be brought together with one J to create the heavy chain. So the next graphic has the heading ‘Rearrangement of genomic DNA is needed to put together a gene that encodes an immunglobulin’. It indicates that, for the light chain, only V and J gene segments are required, whereas the heavy chain also requires the D segments. Most of the cells in our body, and also in the germline at the earliest stage of development, have this arrangement. But during lymphocyte development a recombination event occurs which brings the two (V and J), or three (V, D and J) gene segments together. So, recombination at the heavy and light chain genes for the antibody.
This is all quite different from the recombination that occurs during meiosis and the formation of the gametes. That recombination occurs between homologous chromosomes, while this type brings together and deletes segments along one chromosome to bring these V and J segments together (intra-chromosomal recombination) to create an antibody protein. It’s called VDJ recombination, and is specific to lymphocytes, because during the development of B and T cells there is an induction of recombinases that mediate this recombination [?] In this case a recombination mediated by ‘recombination-activating genes 1 and 2’, aka RAG1 and RAG2. All this is lymphocyte-specific, and these recombinases mediate this rearrangement, bringing unique V, D and J segments together. The diversity derives from the fact that each segment has a unique sequence, coding for a unique amino acid sequence, and a distinct protein.
But the body derives further diversity from another process. When these segments are shuffled there is imprecision – nucleotides can be added or subtracted (deleted) when these segments are joined. This generates more amino acid diversity, called junctional imprecision. So we have imprecise recombination, leading to the insertion or deletion of nucleotides [the basic structural units of nucleic acids – RNA & DNA – consisting of a nucleoside and a phosphate group]. If there is a multiple of three nucleotides either inserted or deleted, the result is a functional antibody. A multiple of three is required, to avoid a ‘frameshift mutation’, because ‘a cell reads a gene’s code in groups of three bases when making a protein’. That’s the system upon which it operates – if you inserted/deleted a single nucleotide along the line you wouldn’t get a functional protein.
Another important thing – which happens not as a consequence of this recombination process, but of activating the T cell, which is that in addition to these variations, there’s also somatic hypermutation – an elevated mutation rate at the Ig locus, which increases further the diversity of the amino acid at these variable antibody regions. This is also known as affinity maturation, as it increases the affinity of the antibody for its antigen. Note that this is T cell-mediated.
So the immunoglobulin gene is not expressed until this recombination occurs. So this recombination leads to the expression of either the heavy chain or the light chain gene. This is because the enhancer is downstream in the gene, so by vanquishing the intervening sequence you bring the promoter within range of the enhancer, and the gene is expressed. It’s really quite romantic.
Remember though that there are two copies of these genes – paternal and maternal, so there’s another feature of this system – allelic exclusion. A B cell expresses only one antibody, so if both alleles are expressing, that wouldn’t be the case. With allelic exclusion, if you get a recombination event that leads to a functional antibody for one of your inherited copies of the gene, it suppresses recombination on the other allele, so you will only get one heavy chain and one light chain gene expressed per B cell.
So these junctions between V, D and J segments are found in the CDR-3 region, and are responsible for the high level of variability at the CDR or hyper-variable 3 region.
So the last feature to describe is ‘memory’, the ability to recall a previously experienced infectious substance. The immune system needs to be able to do this, and this is the principle behind vaccination. A vaccine will inject an attenuated or inactivated foreign agent into your bloodstream so that the immune system will be alerted to that antigen if/when it turns up in the system later.
Several ways in which this ‘remembering’ manifests itself, comparing a primary infection with a secondary infection, the adaptive immune system has very different responses. The primary response is a little delayed, taking between 5 and 10 days, while the secondary response is generally between 1 and 3 days. The magnitude of the response, the concentration of antibodies that are produced, is larger the second time around. And the antibodies themselves have become ‘better’. This can be shown by antibody affinity – how tightly the antibody recognises (and binds to?) the antigen. Antibody affinity (‘tightness’ of recognition) is measured as the dissociation constant for an antibody to a given antigen. The lower the number, the tighter the binding. For the primary infection the antibody affinity is weaker, on the order of 10 to the seventh molar in terms of KD [KD, or KD, is a quantitative measure of antibody affinity – ‘the equilibrium dissociation constant between the antibody and its antigen’], and the secondary infection generates antibodies that are functionally better, less than 10 to the negative eleventh molar (sub-nanomolar), a very tight interaction between two molecules. So, more and better. So from the first infection to the next, a type of B cell – a memory B cell – will express an antibody specific to the previously experienced antigen, because, due to irreversible recombination, this will be encoded in the genome. The memory results from VDJ recombination being irreversible, so those memory B cells will be there even if the antigen is not. These cells can be generated by vaccination.
So ‘effector functions of antibodies’. They can bind to a foreign substance, interfering with its functionality. Neutralisation, for example, which means preventing the antigen from entering cells. Also phagocytosis, recruiting phagocytes to internalise the antigen (e.g. a bacterium), and recruiting killing cells to kill cells.(natural killer cells).
The lecture ends with a story in the fight against breast cancer, a treatment based on a mouse monoclonal antibody. So, we can use antibodies from other species to generate treatments. One example is herceptin, which can be used as a treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer. It’s based on a mouse antibody which recognises the HER2 growth factor receptor, which is over-expressed in about 30% of human breast cancers. Researchers have engineered a human antibody with the mouse sequence at its complementarity-determining region. So you have a human antibody, which won’t be attacked or removed by the human immune system, but will recognise HER2, and recruit immune cells to HER2 positive cells, neutralising and possibly killing them. This is the possible therapeutic aspect of antibodies, whatever their source.
So ends the first lecture.
References
https://www.abcam.co.jp/primary-antibodies/kd-value-a-quantitive-measurement-of-antibody-affinity