a bonobo humanity?

‘Rise above yourself and grasp the world’ Archimedes – attribution

Posts Tagged ‘autoimmune diseases

immunity 2: MIT lecture – more on immunity and auto-immunity

leave a comment »

So we’re looking at cell-mediated and auto-immunity in this second lecture. We see an image of listeria, an intracellular bacterium, pushing out the edges of the cell, so that it can move between cells without entering the extracellular space. Listeria is a food-borne bacterium which can cause severe intestinal illness. So think of a host cell with an intracellular pathogen, bacterial or viral, taking advantage of these cells to reproduce and spread. This is not good.

B cells, as described before, have an antigen receptor, initially on the plasma membrane, and sometimes secreted into the intracellular space, while T cells only have the membrane-bound form. In any case these antibodies are directed outwardly. How can a listeria-like infection, within the cells, be dealt with? This involves a process called antigen presentation, in which peptides – short sequences of amino acids – are presented and displayed on the cell surface, so that T cells, in this case, can observe what is happening within the cell. This involves another molecule previously mentioned, the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). There are two classes of MHC. Class 1 has a heavy chain – a long polypeptide – and a light chain. So, two polypeptides encoded by different genes. It has two Ig domains proximal to the plasma membrane – and it’s all inserted into this membrane – an integral membrane protein. Then at the other end, distal to the plasma membrane, is another structure, which, looking at its crystal structure, is a ‘beta sheet with two alpha helices’, shaped somewhat like a cup [a beta sheet is a common secondary structure in proteins, formed by polypeptide strands (beta strands) connected laterally by hydrogen bonds, creating a pleated, twisted, sheet-like structure]. Inside the cup is a peptide which displays some of its amino acids, away from the MHC molecule, for T cells to observe. 

So these Class 1 MHCs are membrane proteins displayed on all nucleated somatic cells, and the peptides held by these MHCs are derived from the cytoplasm within the cell. They are loaded on to the MHC molecule, which is translated (using ribosomes and types of RNA) on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and its extracellular domain is initially present in the lumen (internal space) of the ER. Its peptides come from proteins in the cytoplasm. What happens to these proteins – including unfolded proteins and those that might be ubiquitinated [refers to a protein that has had ubiquitin, a small protein, covalently attached to it, often marking the protein for degradation or influencing its function or localisation – thanks AI, and it has of course dawned on me that this MIT course has followed on from earlier biochemistry learnin] – is that they’re processed by the proteasome [a large, cylindrical protein complex that degrades proteins tagged with ubiquitin, a process essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis and regulating various processes like cell cycle and protein quality control], which this lecturer describes as ‘a kind of shredder-like function for protein’, which cuts the proteins into peptides which can then be pumped into the ER lumen via a transporter, TAP…

The transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) is a heterodimeric protein complex (TAP1 and TAP2) that transports peptides from the cytosol into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where they bind to MHC class I molecules, a crucial step in antigen presentation to cytotoxic T cells.
from AI overview

From there they are loaded onto the class 1 MHC molecule. The source of these peptides is from proteins in the cytoplasm, processed by the proteasome. So now that a peptide-MHC complex has been created, it can then be trafficked to the plasma membrane of the cell, where the peptide will be displayed for T cells to observe. The types of T cell that look at these class 1 molecules are known as CD8+ T cells. 

There are also class 2 MHC molecules, which have fundamentally different properties. Both molecules display peptides on the cell surface (antigen presentation), but the structure of MHC class 2 is quite different. Instead of a heavy and light chain, there are two chains of roughly equal size, and they’re encoded by different genes than the class 1 MHC. There are two Ig domains proximal to the plasma membrane, and at the end of the MHC molecule there’s a groove or pocket that holds a peptide (aka a peptide-binding cleft). 

The class 2 MHC is expressed on a more restricted set of cells. They’re expressed specifically on specialised antigen-presenting cells, such as B cells and phagocytic cells [also known as phagocytes, they are specialised cells of the immune system that engulf and destroy foreign substances, pathogens, and cellular debris through a process called phagocytosis].

So what is this process? First, phagocytes are white blood cells. Monocytes, neutrophils and macrophages are phagocytes. From Wikipedia:
Phagocytosis is the process by which a cell uses its plasma membrane to engulf a large particle, giving rise to an internal compartment called the phagosome. It is one type of endocytosis. A cell that performs phagocytosis is called a phagocyte.
And AI overview:
Endocytosis is a cellular process where a cell engulfs extracellular material, forming an internal vesicle to transport substances into the cell. This process, which includes phagocytosis (cell eating) and pinocytosis (cell drinking), is essential for nutrient uptake, cell signalling, and defence against pathogens.
There’s also another antigen-presenting cell called a dendritic cell:
Dendritic cells (DCs) are crucial immune cells that act as sentinels, capturing antigens and presenting them to T cells to initiate adaptive immune responses, effectively bridging innate and adaptive immunity (from AI overview)
The focus in this lecture will be on the B cells. So class 1 is expressed everywhere, whereas class 2 is expressed specifically on antigen-presenting cells. The source of the peptides and the way they’re generated is also quite different. Peptides for class 2 come from the extracellular space, and are processed by lysosomal proteases.
 
So cells can take in material through endocytosis. An antigen can be endocytosed by the cell, so it’s in a cell vesicle. It can go to the lysosome, where lysosomal proteases can cut up this protein-based antigen into peptides. MHC 2 is translated, like all plasma membrane proteins, in the ER. But in the ER the peptide groove may be blocked – peptides from the cytoplasm cannot interact with class 2, so they’re trafficked to a unique compartment that can combine with the compartment that has the peptides that originated from outside the cell, and then those can be loaded onto the class 2 molecule, so that this can be recognised by T cells. In the case described, not a CD8+ T cell (aka a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)), but a CD4+ T cell. 
 
So, to review, class 1 MHC is expressed on all nucleated cells, but class 2 is more restricted, expressed specifically on antigen-presenting cells. These two classes are recognised by different T cells – class 1 MHC is recognised by CD8+ cells, class 2 by CD4+ cells. Also the source of the antigens is different in each case – the cytoplasm for class 1, the extracellular space for class 2. So they’re each sampling different pools of proteins. Where the peptide is loaded is also different. For class 1, the endoplasmic reticulum, for class 2, a vesicle compartment resulting from endocytosis of an extracellular antigen. 
 
Now for the T cell receptor (TCR), which has two chains, alpha and beta, into the ectoplasm from the plasma membrane. Each chain or sub-unit has two Ig domains. The receptor recognises antigens through its variable domain, which then binds to the receptor. The TCR interacts or docks with the MHC-peptide complex. For the TCR to do this, it must recognise the specific conformation of the peptide being extended out from the cell. There’s a diversity of TCRs which can discriminate between the different peptides loaded on to MHC. 
 
How does this diversity occur? The same as with antibodies. This rearrangement of gene segments in the variable domain of the antibody is due to recombination at the genomic locus. What does this mean? Good question. 
 
A diagram is shown for the beta chain of the TCR. Like the B cell receptor (BCR), there is a gene rearrangement in the genomic DNA that brings V, D and J segments together to make the variable chain of the T cell receptor. So as with the B cell receptor there’s a gene rearrangement, aka VDJ recombination – not splicing of the transcript [?] but within the genomic DNA. By having this happen in the genomic DNA, an irreversible change occurs. So all subsequent cells derived from the original B or T cell will express the identical B or T cell receptor. An irreversible change to the DNA. But the TCR is not the only way the TCR can interact with antigen-presenting cells. There are other co-receptors on the T cell, CD4 and CD8, expressed on different subsets of T cells. These co-receptors are also required to get an immune response. So if the T cell receptor and the co-receptor both bind to the MHC you get a particular response – both are needed. CD4 cells recognise class 2 of MHC, CD8 recognises class 1. So, two subsets of T cells recognising different MHC complexes. 
 
What should CD8+ T cells do? Where are the peptides coming from that are presented on the class 1 MHCs which will be presented to CD8?  What does it mean if you have a class 1 MHC molecule containing a foreign-looking peptide? These peptides come from the cytosol as foreign elements and ‘need to be dealt with’. You may have, for example, an intracellular parasite taking advantage of the host cell to reproduce itself. If the immune cell has an indication of this sort of problem – for example cancer cells – if you have an oncogenic mutation in the genes, those could be recognised as foreign, and one response might be to do something to the cell to limit expansion of the tumour. Or if it’s an intracellular parasite, you would need to terminate the cell to stop the spread of the virus, say, that the cell is producing. That’s to say – to kill the cell. 
 
So, CD8+ T cells are also known as killer or cytotoxic T cells. So if a CD8+ T cell recognises an MHC class 1 peptide complex then it releases internal material that perforates that cell so that it undergoes cell death. This limits infection by killing the cells that the pathogen is using to replicate itself.  
 
CD4+ T cells are quite  different. I will try to get this. They have to do with the MHC class 2 cells, which are B cells that recognise foreign agents. They bind to and internalise those agents, presenting parts of them on the exterior of the cell. The CD4+ T cells would not want to kill those MHC class 2 cells, because they are what is needed to fight the antigen. You have a B cell that can produce antibodies, so you want to help it, to enhance its function. So these CD4+ T cells are also known as helper T cells, as they enhance B cell function in various ways. This association occurs in the lymph nodes, where there are antigen-presenting cells and soluble antigens coming in, as well as B and T cells. These B and T cells are effectively awaiting interactions between distinct immune cell types. When you get a B cell that presents an antigen that’s recognised by a T cell, that cell enhances B cell function in a variety of ways. Firstly it induces a response in the B cell, called affinity maturation. This results from a hypermutation of the variable domain of the antibody, providing more diversity, such that a B cell can be selected with even tighter binding to the antigen. 
 
So affinity maturation creates the transition from weak to tighter binding, a difference between the primary and secondary immune response. Antibodies ‘improve’ due to B and C cell interaction through the affinity maturation process. Also, B cells can produce different types of antibodies (isotypes) – known as isotype switching – and we’re shown a chart titled ‘Ig isotype switching varies the constant domain to elicit varied effector functions’. The chart shows, inter alia, the genomic locus for the heavy chain of an immunoglobulin. There’s a VDJ segment which has undergone recombination, and a string of exons that encode a different isotype for the antibody [In genetics, exons are coding sequences of DNA or RNA that are expressed in the final mRNA product, while introns are non-coding sequences that are removed during RNA splicing].  The first one is mu, which, when it is proximal to VDJ, produces IgM. That’s the initial state of the antibody, which is initially membrane-bound and serves as the B cell receptor. Each of these different constant domains have different effector functions even though they aren’t undergoing variation. They can do different things for the body. As an example, if you had isotype switching, and a recombination event that brought a gamma 2 segment together with VDJ, that would produce isotype IgG, a highly secreted form of the antibody that is effective for bacterial infections. It’s secreted in the blood and can neutralise bacteria and so limit infections.
 
But there are many other possibilities. You could get VDJ together with an alpha, producing an isotype known as IgA, which produces mucosal immunity because it can pass through the epithelial linings. IgE is another antibody type – and the constant domains are constant for each isotype, but they recruit different effector functions. So IgG attacks bacteria by promoting their phagocytosis, while IgE is good at dealing with intestinal worms. So isotype switching allows the immune system to adapt to deal with particular pathogen types.
Another, final way in which T cells enhance this function is to promote the differentiation of B cells, one of which is a memory B cell, which can last for decades in the body, even without antigens. 
 
So if you have a B cell which recognises an antigen – say, a protein – it would internalise that protein via endocytosis and then process it so that peptides from the antigen can be displayed on its surface. If that is recognised by a T cell, this leads to an interaction between the T and B cells, leading to such events as affinity maturation and isotype switching – got that?
 
The variable chain doesn’t change with isotype switching. It’s always able to recognise that antigen, but it is recruiting different effector functions. You can also have differentiation of B cells into plasma cells, which secrete many antibodies to fight infection. 
 
So for a vaccine to be effective you need to engage a T cell response, to have everything happening as above. You can’t just activate the humoral (bodily fluid) side, you need to also activate the cell-mediated side such that they interact, to enhance the immune response.  
The immune system faces a big problem, in that it has to be able to discriminate between self and foreign. If your immune system recognises an antigen that is in fact native to the bodily system, that may result in an auto-immune disease. There’s a balance between tolerating and attacking antigens. We have discussed the B cell receptor, the antibody and the T cell receptor. Our body generates tens of millions of these diverse antigen receptors which recognise different molecules. It does this constitutively, that’s to say, automatically, without the need for any infection. It is just a normal function of T and B cells. It’s also random, in that any combination of V, D and J segments could occur, and they could mutate in various ways, so that you could generate a receptor that recognises a protein native to your body. 
 
There are several diseases caused by auto-immunity. Diseases caused by ‘self-recognising’ antibodies include Myasthenia gravis (muscle weakness), in which individuals generate an antibody against a receptor for a neurotransmitter (acetylcholine). This neurotransmitter is largely involved in sending signals from a motor neuron to a muscle, so antibodies that inhibit this receptor will cause muscle weakness. Self antibodies can also result in diabetes. Individuals can develop antibodies that recognise and inhibit the insulin receptor, leading to insulin resistance and diabetes (Diabetes mellitus). Diseases caused by ‘self recognising’ T cells include multiple sclerosis. The myelin sheath around axons increases the speed of their action potential. If T cells attack the myelin sheath, the electrical signalling process is disrupted, and this is the cause of MS.  Type 1 diabetes (Diabetes mellitus) can also involve T cells. If they attack and destroy the islet cells of the pancreas, the body’s capacity to produce insulin is disrupted. 
 
So the immune system needs to have a way of distinguishing between self and non-self. It needs to have different responses for self versus foreign recognition. For self-recognition, there needs to be a negative selection against that cell, and for foreign recognition, positive selection. Negative selection is mediated by apoptosis [A type of cell death in which a series of molecular steps in a cell lead to its death. This is one method the body uses to get rid of unneeded or abnormal cells]. Positive selection might be activation and also proliferation of the cell type. As shown in the image, entitled ‘Cell division can lead to a clonal population of cells all of which express same antibody’, a cell that recognises a foreign antigen would be activated, undergoing a monoclonal expansion, with the resulting cells expressing the same antibody, recognising the same antigen. So we know what to do with self versus foreign, but how do we distinguish between them? There are several mechanisms. First, the B and C cells in the lymphoid organs, where they mature and undergo genomic rearrangements, are largely protected from foreign agents, so there are only ‘self antigens’ in those generative lymphoid organs. They are the bone marrow for B cells and the thymus for T cells. If a B or T cell’s receptor engages with something tightly during development, this is a signal for the immune system to kill or ‘delete’ that cell. So, upon self-recognition, there will be apoptosis and deletion of the cell. The second way for the body to make the distinction is that it responds better to antigens when there is also a response from the innate immune system – call it a ‘coincidence detector’, strongly indicating a foreign antigen. Otherwise it might be a ‘self antigen’. This is important for vaccine development, as in most vaccines, in addition to having an antigen that’s a part of the infectious agent there’s also an adjuvant – something to activate the innate immune system to respond. This is important because if you only have the antigen the response would be much less robust. You need both systems to respond together if possible. 
 
So in the year of this lecture (2018), the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine was awarded for work which involved another mechanism which prevents auto-immunity and down-regulates the activity of particular T cells. We have only talked about activation of T cells, with the T cell receptors CD4 and CD8, but there are also inhibiting receptors on the surface of T cells, two of which are CTLA4 and PD1. They keep the immune system in check. It’s about signalling and its activation. Once a signal is sent there is often a negative feedback, causing signal termination. So that you don’t just have a continuous constitutive activation (inflammation and immune response). So this takes us back to the Prize-winning work afore-mentioned, in which the researchers explored the possibilities of signal termination for cancer treatment. Some cancer cells can express the ligand [a molecule that binds to another (usually larger) molecule] for these inhibitory receptors, so that they can prevent the immune system from recognising the tumour. This is basically creating an inhibitor blockade, but this would be a tricky treatment/solution, as it can lead to auto-immune disease. 
 
That’s it for lecture two. I will likely return to this fascinating topic via other lectures/videos in the near future. 
the stuff in square brackets is from AI Overview

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phagocytosis

Written by stewart henderson

April 13, 2025 at 6:58 pm

exploring chronic fatigue syndrome, myalgic encephalomyelitis, etc

leave a comment »

published in 1991

Canto: What do you know about chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)?

Jacinta: Not much. I read somewhere recently that it’s a term not so much used now. Maybe because the term ‘syndrome’, I think, is a kind of ‘placeholder’, like a collection of symptoms – adding up to a regular feeling of fatigue for no clear reason, or without an established cause, or set of causes. And now maybe they’ve established some causes, and the ‘syndrome’ has been divided up into a few more clearly understood disorders.

Canto: Well, that may be so, but I know that, some twenty years ago or so, there seemed to be a spate of people coming down with what they called CFS – sports people, entertainers, people in the limelight for one reason or another – but I don’t hear so much about it now. So I’m wondering – can a person have this syndrome, or one of its instantiations, on and off for, say, 27 years?

Jacinta: I’ve no idea? Why do you ask?

Canto: Well, I know of someone who still attributes her aches and pains – at least some of them – to chronic fatigue, some twenty-odd years after getting that diagnosis, and it bothers me… I know that there’s an issue out there about women’s health, and women not being believed, particularly by male doctors, and I’m male…

Jacinta: Well recently what they call ‘long Covid’ has cropped up, and it seems to be similar. I know from experience that you can have a serious illness, I mean an infection, one that really puts you on your back and takes a long time to recover from, and it really changes your life in a ‘before and after’ sense. That’s to say, after that illness you never feel quite the same again, as if your immune system has been permanently compromised, damaged in some way. That seems to be happening with long Covid, and maybe it’s an issue for CFS. Maybe CFS starts with an infection that more or less compromises the immune system. Of course I’m no expert on matters medical…

Canto: So some research is required. As I recall, another name for CFS is myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), which at least sounds like a right proper disease, one to scare the bejazus out of people – especially the ‘encephalo’ part. Clearly it eats your brain.

Jacinta: The ‘myalgic’ term has to do with muscles, tendons, ligaments and stuff. And muscle etc pain, or myalgia, can have an astronomical number of causes. The ‘encephalomyelitis’ term can be broken into two parts. The ‘myelitis’ part refers to myelin, the white-coloured material that sheaths our neural circuitry. ‘Encephalo’, as you say, refers to the brain in general. Encephalomyelitis is defined as ‘inflammation of the brain and spinal cord’, of which there are many types. For instance, Encephalomyelitis disseminata is another name for multiple sclerosis. So ME, if this is just another name for CFS, involves the muscles and associated tissue, and the nerves leading to and from them.

Canto: Okay, that’s all useful, but I’m just wondering whether, if you come down with CFS, or ME, it might be with you, like, forever.

Jacinta: It’s interesting that ME suggests there is evidence of damage to myelin in this condition. That needs to be explored further. I’ve accessed a book published in 1990 called The disease of a thousand names, by Dr David Bell, a pioneer in exploring this syndrome. The name he gives to it is Chronic Fatigue/Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS), and on the cover he gives no less than 37 alternative names, some of them, such as Yuppie Flu and Yuppy plague, less serious, or more dismissive, than others. In the foreword he presents the hope that the book will be a starting point for further study, and makes his view of the disease/syndrome/condition clear:

I freely admit to bias in writing this book. I fully believe that CFIDS is a specific, organic illness, caused by a specific agent or agents. I make no claims to be impartial in the argument of whether the illness is real or not. It is interesting that of those researchers directly involved in epidemics of CFIDS, there is no discussion of this question. Personal experience has made the issue irrelevant and even insulting.

Canto: So that’s over 30 years ago, and now I’m watching a disturbing DW documentary from just under a year ago, telling the story of three German sufferers from this condition – and they’re suffering very badly, without a doubt. It also focuses on the doctors, neurologists and researchers trying to get a handle on it. One of them, Dr Carmen Scheibenbogen, an immunologist and oncologist, points out that still, after 30 years, we’ve made little progress, and that very few scientists are working on the disease (which for convenience, let’s call CFS), especially compared to the number of sufferers. They estimate that 17 to 24 million people have it worldwide, with women outnumbering men. They also estimate that only half of sufferers have been diagnosed – but whether that means they think the number may be as much as 50 million or that only 8 to 12 million have been diagnosed isn’t made clear.

Jacinta: Well Dr Bell’s intro ends optimistically:

It is my hope that by the time this book is published, much of the speculation presented here will have been confirmed. If so, the absurd argument of whether this illness is ‘real’ will have ended, an unnecessary argument that has caused so much pain and added so greatly to the burden of those ill with chronic fatigue/immune dysfunction syndrome.

I’d guess he’d be sadly disappointed if he’s still around today. As he notes in the first chapter, the number of names given to the illness is a testament to ignorance more than anything else. And the term CFS arguably downplays the seriousness and debilitating nature of the symptoms, and suggests nothing about damage to the immune system, for example.

Canto: Hearing the stories of the sufferers, and watching them actually and obviously suffering, is itself painful. They seem in a sense like the disappeared. Their illness causes them to disappear from the workplace, from civic or social activity, from any circle wider than immediate family. And all of them seem lost in the mystery of their condition. The term ME is suggestive of inflammation, but often there’s no detectable inflammation. The symptom most common to all sufferers according to Dr Scheibenbogen is a very low tolerance of exertion.

Jacinta: I note that Dr Bell writes of the difficulty of defining a precise set of symptoms, which ‘has surrounded the illness for the past 20 years’, which dates the illness back to 1970 or before. He mentions recent recognition by the CDC, as ‘an illness characterised by months or years of severe pain and exhaustion nearly everywhere’. He also expresses his view, and hope, that ‘it is most likely caused by a single specific agent’. From my laywoman’s perspective, I’m very doubtful about that.

Canto: One of the subjects in the documentary, a teenager, contracted mononucleosis two years before, and hasn’t been the same since. Mononucleosis, often called the kissing disease, is carried by the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and so no doubt this virus and/or its relatives have been focused on as possible sources of the illness. Listening to her describing the problem as like a faulty battery which doesn’t recharge properly suddenly made me think of a far more horrific illness, encephalitis lethargica, which killed hundreds of thousands of Europeans from when it first appeared there in 1916. In their case, the battery often ceased to function, leaving them in a state something like total paralysis – but with some mental processes intact. In her book of the epidemic, Asleep, Molly Caldwell Crosby describes a very young woman struck down by the disease, visited by a physician, who rather unprofessionally told her family at the bedside that there was no hope. Her eyes welled with tears. She died shortly afterwards. The image it brings to life still haunts me. No cure or cause of the disease has ever been found.

Jacinta: So, as we explore this current ‘disease of a thousand names’ it does certainly seem that some manifestations can be lifelong. However, because they tend not to be life-threatening, and because causes can’t be found via biopsies, blood tests and the like, it’s generally seen as a ‘diagnosis by exclusion’. And of course it’s likely believed to be psychosomatic by many more than care to admit…

Canto: And yet the WHO recognised it as a neurological disease back in 1969. Perhaps that designation doesn’t help, because it’s often seen as a ‘mind’ disease, something like depression. But getting back to mononucleosis, which has been seen as a stepping-stone or trigger in some cases, it does seem likely that CFS starts with infection, particularly viral infection (SARS, enteroviruses), though again, not in all cases. It does seem to be a case of excessive immune reaction, which can perhaps also be triggered by injury or surgery. EBV is very common – more than 90% of humans catch it, usually in childhood, when it’s more often than not asymptomatic. But in can re-appear as mononucleosis later, usually in early adult life, according to the documentary, though it’s not clear whether that means reinfection, or a virus that lies dormant for a period. In any case, the symptoms are swollen lymph nodes, fatigue, sore throat and a high temperature.

Jacinta: I’ve heard of it, but I thought it was some exotic virus, nothing that I’d ever catch. Sounds like I’ve already been infected…

Canto: Perhaps, but not reinfected – and there can be much more serious, even life-threatening complications, such as spleen damage, low blood cell count and respiratory disease. And CFS.

Jacinta: Well it seems to me that the great mystery of encephalitis lethargica is an object lesson as to how little we know about the ailments and infections our bodies are prey to. It seems that they’re prone to over-reaction, as is the case with allergies, and the ‘cytokine storm’ in Covid-19. But the problem with CFS is that, quite often, no previous infection can be pinpointed.

Canto: Well, this may tell us something new about viruses, and about the immune system, as, to some extent, Covid-19 has. Mononucleosis, for example, is generally seen as a mild illness, but not always, and in some cases it can be life-threatening, or it can somehow stuff up the immune system, leaving sufferers prey to a range of ailments. Some of these are clearly described from symptoms rather than causative agents – for example post-exertional malaise (PEM). Without a clearly defined cause, one can only treat symptoms. And because the symptoms are mostly not life-threatening in any obvious way, it can easily be seen as ‘psychosomatic’, and it doesn’t attract funding. And even with encephalitis lethargica, a killing disease, no causative agent has been found. We just hope it has permanently disappeared, which isn’t very satisfactory. Also, with CFS there are generally no visible symptoms, so physicians must rely on reported symptoms, which actually takes the power out of the hands of the ‘expert’. So, the condition has this difficult status – difficult to attract funding, and virtually impossible to insure against.

Jacinta: Yes, so the hunt is really on for causal factors. It seems to be all about the immune system being ‘overactive and/or misdirected’ as Dr Scheibenbogen puts it. The argument some are putting forward is that it interferes with the autonomic nervous system, taking over much of its function. The autonomic nervous system controls our breathing, our heartbeat, our digestion, and our blood flow. Without effective blood flow, there will be muscle problems, dizziness, poor concentration and general feelings of weakness. Oxygenating the blood helps to energise our whole system. Key to all this is our beta 2 receptors. Here’s something about them from a NIH article:

Beta 2 receptors are predominantly present in airway smooth muscles. They also exist on cardiac muscles, uterine muscles, alveolar type II cells, mast cells, mucous glands, epithelial cells, vascular endothelium, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and skeletal muscles.

Canto: So, beta 2 receptors, something to be researched and kept in mind. The documentary presents a CFS sufferer whose autoimmune neurotransmitters are considerably elevated – whatever that means. They’re also described as ‘antibodies’. Dr Scheibenbogen suggests that CFS is disrupting their functionality. Muscles are not being properly supplied with blood, leading to pain and exhaustion. And all this has something to do with a dysfunctional immune system, and a possible problem with the normal dilation of the blood vessels, which carry oxygen to all the body’s muscles and organs. Which takes us back to the beta 2 receptors, located on the blood vessels in muscles. They’re controlled by adrenalin, released during exertion, and antibodies. These antibodies have been found to be dysfunctional in CFS sufferers, resulting in problems with oxygen supply. Dr Scheibenbogen describes one patient’s results:

We know the patient has antibodies against the beta 2 receptor. What we want to know is, which part of the receptor. We’ve divided up the beta 2 receptor into 15 small pieces and stuck each piece onto a different little bead. They glow in slightly different colours, and then we can see…We can compare these reactions to those of healthy subjects. This will help us understand the disruptive receptor pattern better. If there are distinct differences, a clear pattern, we could use this as a diagnostic test.

Samples from different patients are sent to the Julius Maximilians University in Wurzburg, where a team led by Dr Bhupesh Prusty, a microbiologist and virologist, are trying to find infectious agents that might be responsible for or contributory to the disease. Dr Prusty has been studying the role of viruses for many years and was the first to discover the link between EBV and CFS. Here’s what he had to say:

‘What we have found is that herpes viruses, particularly human herpes virus type 6 (HHV6), and Epstein-Barr virus, are the most interesting candidates which can contribute to the development of the disease. We have found that HHV6 produces a small RNA, and that this small RNA can directly target mitochondria to fragment, and it’s already known that in EBV infection mitochondria is also fragmented, so we believe that this virus-induced mitochondrial fragmentation is one of the most important steps in the development of CFS’.

So the documentary turns to mitochondria, the energy organelles in all our somatic cells.

Jacinta: So we turn to ATP and all that. Fragmented mitochondria aren’t going to bode well for our energy levels.

Canto: Dr Prusty’s team have injected antibodies from the blood of CFS patients into healthy cell cultures to see if a factor in the serum of those patients affects the healthy mitochondria. The experiment resulted in mitochondrial fragmentation, which would result in a weakened immune response in the event of future infections, and a generally slower metabolism. Tests of this kind could be used in the diagnosis of CFS – an enormous advance (I’m quoting or paraphrasing the documentary of course). Dr Prusty says the test works for seriously ill CFS patients, but much less so for milder cases. So it would be diagnostic in some cases and it also points towards something causal, though the precise mechanisms would have to be worked out. And there are funding problems hampering further research.

Jacinta: Dr Bell was writing about the lack of funding in his 1990 book, so nothing has changed. And as with the documentary, case histories are presented, of people cut down by this illness, unable to work, unable to obtain insurance or compensation, unable to find solutions, and suspicious or aware that health authorities, family members and others feel that they’re exaggerating or malingering. Often diagnoses cite depression, and of course depression does set in after a long period of incapacity.

Canto: The doco presents a graph that is, well, graphic, in comparing USA funding for multiple sclerosis and HIV compared to CFS (HIV outscores both of the others by a vast amount). Grassroots funding groups are struggling to make a difference, to amplify the issue and combat stigmatisation. Pharmaceutical companies have shown no interest, no doubt because the symptoms seem vague and lacking in ‘acuteness’, and there are no biological markers to provide focus for a cure or a clear form of relief. Meanwhile, the sufferers themselves feel a sense of being useless or having ‘disappeared’ from active social life. A possible drug for treating CFS, Rituximab, was recently trialed in Norway, based on the hypothesis that it is an auto-immune disease, ‘with a role for auto-antibodies and  B-lymphocytes’, according to Dr Oystein Fluge, who led the trial. The documentary explains:

B cells are important immune cells in our body that produce antibodies that destroy viruses and bacteria. Unfortunately this process sometimes goes awry, and the B cells produce antibodies that don’t work properly, or actually attack the body itself. This occurs in many auto-immune diseases, like lupus or myasthenia gravis [a chronic autoimmune, neuromuscular disease that causes weakness in the skeletal muscles]. Scientists believe that ME/CFS is one such auto-immune disease. Rituximab is a medication which temporarily destroys B cells, preventing them from producing antibodies to attack a person’s own body.

Three small trials showed considerable promise, so a ‘phase 3’ randomised, double blind trial, involving 152 patients, was next conducted. One of the major hopes was that a diagnosis could be made based on defective antibodies, and ‘whether a marker could be found in the blood that could simplify the diagnosis’. Could they have been previously infected with EBV? There is apparently a diagnostic test for this, and this has been found in some CFS sufferers, but more proof, through larger-scale testing, is needed. Meanwhile, the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic has left many people with CFS-like symptoms, and while this is in one sense disastrous, it could be a wake-up call for trying to better understand auto-immune diseases – of which CFS is likely one. So far, we have associations rather than proven causes, but the association of a CFS-like illness such as ‘long Covid’ with a disease that clearly plays havoc with our immune system is, to say the least, extremely suggestive. As one researcher points out, being able to establish a cause will encourage people to seek treatment earlier, reducing the damage that time brings about.

Jacinta: Yes, people suffering from ‘long covid’, as it’s called, are of course making the connection with CFS and highlighting the lack of progress re this presumably auto-immune disease.

Canto: Yes, Dr Scheibenbogen is concerned that an after-effect of the pandemic will be a spike in long-term CFS sufferers, which we may already be seeing. The silver lining, though, may be an increased focus on, and increased funding for, solving its current mysteries. Dr Prusty is still of the view that latent herpes viruses are reactivated after covid and perhaps other autoimmune infections. It just isn’t known whether long covid and CFS are essentially the same condition. Meanwhile as Dr Uta Behrends, another frontline researcher in CFS, points out, sufferers need to have a diagnosis made as soon as possible so that they can be supported, so that they don’t feel isolated and become depressed, as so often happens.

Jacinta: Supported, but how can they be treated, when there’s no clear cause?

Canto: Indeed. The Norway trial returned a negative result. This may have been because the Rituximab dosage was low due to lack of funding. Still, the researchers have collected a sizeable bank of blood samples to test with other drugs or enhanced versions of Rituximab. There is also a problem with correct diagnosis of CFS, and perhaps a reluctance to diagnose such a condition in the absence of clear biomarkers. Meanwhile the suffering continues, and an untold number of people remain in limbo…

References

Dr David Bell, The disease of a thousand names, 1991

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559069/

https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/myasthenia-gravis

Written by stewart henderson

March 27, 2023 at 9:43 pm